http://grouchypants.net/2006/01/09/107/ Filled with an intense, burning indifference. Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:20:50 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://grouchypants.net/2006/01/09/107/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Sago Boulevard :: Secular Humanism’s Achilles’ Heel :: January :: 2006 Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:04:27 +0000 http://grouchypants.net/?p=107#comment-4 [...] Madeleine Bunting picks up on what I think is the most serious problem of Richard Dawkins’ brand of secular humanism. (via Mr. Grouchypants) It simpy “hasn’t generated a compelling popular narrative and ethic of what it is to be human and our place in the cosmos.” The misguided alliance of atheism and science further obfuscates the key issues. Science will never tell us why we are here and what our role is in relationship to the world that we perceive around us. [...] [...] Madeleine Bunting picks up on what I think is the most serious problem of Richard Dawkins’ brand of secular humanism. (via Mr. Grouchypants) It simpy “hasn’t generated a compelling popular narrative and ethic of what it is to be human and our place in the cosmos.” The misguided alliance of atheism and science further obfuscates the key issues. Science will never tell us why we are here and what our role is in relationship to the world that we perceive around us. [...]

]]>